Beyond the Standard Model (BSM)
"Lighthouse Model" -
The New Standard Model of Elementary Particles (1024-QAM)
Caution: The government criminals (NSA) have likely placed tracking tags on images and files on this website.
"Lighthouse Model" -
The New Standard Model of Elementary Particles (1024-QAM)
Caution: The government criminals (NSA) have likely placed tracking tags on images and files on this website.
// Copyright @2024, by RLighthouse LLC
/
/
/
Rev 10.1
/
/
/
Rev 10.1
/ Copyright @2024, by RLighthouse LLC
Mass estimates in RED.
/
/
/
Rev 10.3
Table with Supersymmetry
Mass estimates in RED.
/
/
/
Rev 10.3
Table with Supersymmetry
Revision to the QAM model.
Notes:
1. QAM pattern is due to a blinking universe at 1.1 THz.
2. Red mass values are engineering estimates +/- 20%.
Although, the Jane particle is precisely calculated to be 3.32 MeV/c2 using the Foide formula.
3. Evidence is already available in existing data at SLAC, Fermi & CERN.
4. Some particle lifetimes are much less than 1 trillionth of second.
5. Nyquist-Shannon theory requires sample rate of 2.2 Thz or faster
6. Cameras at CERN: 40 million frames/second is too slow.
7. Mathematical pattern of particle masses may be similar to a hyperbolic or parabolic function.
8. High pass/low pass filter creates a "mass trap" for detection.
9. The "colors" seen with quarks are actually the 16 probabilities (4 charges x 4 spins) that are rapidly
changing to maintain a stable particle.
10. DARPA has been stealing my intellectual property for many years. RICO organization.
Quanta Magazine notes that, "And HAWC does not probe perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the earlier data: a mysterious narrow dip in the gamma-ray signal at frequencies of 1 trillion trillion hertz. (10^24)" This value coincides with the last mass group (mass group 16) in the 1024-QAM table at 100 ZeV. Beyond this mass group, there are no more elementary particles - and this explains the dip. This provides further experimental evidence that the 1024-QAM Model is correct.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-solar-gamma-rays-discovered-at-even-higher-energies-20230227/
/
/
/
Rev 10.4
Notes:
1. QAM pattern is due to a blinking universe at 1.1 THz.
2. Red mass values are engineering estimates +/- 20%.
Although, the Jane particle is precisely calculated to be 3.32 MeV/c2 using the Foide formula.
3. Evidence is already available in existing data at SLAC, Fermi & CERN.
4. Some particle lifetimes are much less than 1 trillionth of second.
5. Nyquist-Shannon theory requires sample rate of 2.2 Thz or faster
6. Cameras at CERN: 40 million frames/second is too slow.
7. Mathematical pattern of particle masses may be similar to a hyperbolic or parabolic function.
8. High pass/low pass filter creates a "mass trap" for detection.
9. The "colors" seen with quarks are actually the 16 probabilities (4 charges x 4 spins) that are rapidly
changing to maintain a stable particle.
10. DARPA has been stealing my intellectual property for many years. RICO organization.
Quanta Magazine notes that, "And HAWC does not probe perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the earlier data: a mysterious narrow dip in the gamma-ray signal at frequencies of 1 trillion trillion hertz. (10^24)" This value coincides with the last mass group (mass group 16) in the 1024-QAM table at 100 ZeV. Beyond this mass group, there are no more elementary particles - and this explains the dip. This provides further experimental evidence that the 1024-QAM Model is correct.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-solar-gamma-rays-discovered-at-even-higher-energies-20230227/
/
/
/
Rev 10.4
"They are, if you prefer, incipient particles that have not yet emerged into matter."
-- Seth Speaks, Session 524, 1970.
" ... dream reality is as valid and real as waking reality."
-- Seth Material, Chapter 14.
Comments and Notes on the 1024-QAM Periodic Table
10 April 2024, Rev 2
1) It looks like the Clara and Stanford particles might be neutrinos. Does this mean that all fourth particles (IV) are neutrinos, or just 4 of them? It seems likely then that the Top Boson is also a heavy neutrino. The other possibility is - the Muon and Tau neutrinos, are not neutrinos, due to their heavier mass.
I am leaning towards - only 4. This template would then apply to the supersymmetry side.
- 4 Dimensions
- 4 Quadrants
- 4 Particle types
- 4 charges
- 4 spins
- 4 neutrinos
2) The Top Quark is obviously a Boson. They will figure it out. I renamed the Upsilon particle to the Epsilon particle. I was not aware that the name had been previously used to identify a Meson. Renamed the Tetra - Ana, for Ana Toledo.
3) Supersymmetry particles in the 9th thru 16th mass groups probably have very short lives. This may readily explain one of the difficulties in identifying them. A faster "camera system" at CERN or FERMI should reveal something.
4) Quanta Magazine notes that, "And HAWC does not probe perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the earlier data: a mysterious narrow dip in the gamma-ray signal at frequencies of 1 trillion trillion hertz. (10^24)" This value coincides with the last mass group (mass group 16) in the 1024-QAM table at 100 ZeV. Beyond this mass group, there are no more elementary particles - and this explains the dip. This provides further evidence that the 1024-QAM Model is correct.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-solar-gamma-rays-discovered-at-even-higher-energies-20230227/
This also suggests that some of the vibrations found in frequencies of 10^12 thru 10^23 are likely from elementary particles as predicted by the 1024-QAM model. For example, if there are 4 peaks in the range of 100 ZeV thru 990 ZeV, then this may be evidence of the 4 particles - Wino, Zino, Higgsino, & Grand.
5) Theodore Lach's equation, at first seemed very promising, but I now believe it is not correct. We can estimate the mass values of unidentified particles, and using an invention called a "Mass Trap" - we may be able to isolate them. A Mass Trap would be a device that only allows a mass of a narrow range of values to pass thru - sort of like a low pass and high pass filter together creating a narrow range.
6) If it can be isolated, the Grand particle is possibly so large that it can be seen with the naked eye, under certain conditions. It is possibly as large as a single cell. Is it possibly as large as the entire calculated universe? = 0.272 mm (0.01")
6) In schematic theory, the 3 universes of Matter, Antimatter, and Dream, can be fitted together like a "Y" shape, where the Dream universe is in the middle and "feeding" particles into the universes of matter and antimatter. The question remains - how do parallel universes "fit" together with these schematics? Does the Dream universe also feed the parallel universes? This seems necessary for the universes to be related.
7) Is there any method to prove the existence of Massless particles in the Dream universe? It seems like a very challenging problem... Perhaps monitoring the influx of particles at the E point - might show evidence of the particles acquiring mass.
8) Seth said that by closely watching the neutral line (C and E points) we should be able to glimpse into the universe of antimatter. A very interesting prospect...
9) The Mass Groups of the Dream Universe cannot really be called that. Perhaps "Energy Groups" is a better term.
10) It seems odd that there are only 512 particles in the Dream Universe. A more elegant solution would seem to be, the same number of particles. There must be a valid reason for this? Do mass particles need to appear in pairs for some reason?
11) Our entire universal design seems to be structured around counting in "tens" and orders of magnitude. Why would every intelligent race necessarily count in "tens"? They might learn to count in Base 2 or Base 8...
12) The next easiest particles to identify should be Tetra, Nu, and Epsilon. These were the first 3 that I predicted. The mass range suggests they are easy to find. They might already be hidden in the data of previous experiments at CERN and FERMI.
13) In 1991, the Oh-My-God particle's energy was estimated as (3.2±0.9)×10^20 eV. This amount of ~100 FeV, lines up nicely with the 1024-QAM Model. It may have been an sStrange particle, the heavyweight counterpart of the Strange particle.
14) At least seven similar events (energy 5.7×10^19 eV or greater) have been recorded.
-- Seth Speaks, Session 524, 1970.
" ... dream reality is as valid and real as waking reality."
-- Seth Material, Chapter 14.
Comments and Notes on the 1024-QAM Periodic Table
10 April 2024, Rev 2
1) It looks like the Clara and Stanford particles might be neutrinos. Does this mean that all fourth particles (IV) are neutrinos, or just 4 of them? It seems likely then that the Top Boson is also a heavy neutrino. The other possibility is - the Muon and Tau neutrinos, are not neutrinos, due to their heavier mass.
I am leaning towards - only 4. This template would then apply to the supersymmetry side.
- 4 Dimensions
- 4 Quadrants
- 4 Particle types
- 4 charges
- 4 spins
- 4 neutrinos
2) The Top Quark is obviously a Boson. They will figure it out. I renamed the Upsilon particle to the Epsilon particle. I was not aware that the name had been previously used to identify a Meson. Renamed the Tetra - Ana, for Ana Toledo.
3) Supersymmetry particles in the 9th thru 16th mass groups probably have very short lives. This may readily explain one of the difficulties in identifying them. A faster "camera system" at CERN or FERMI should reveal something.
4) Quanta Magazine notes that, "And HAWC does not probe perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the earlier data: a mysterious narrow dip in the gamma-ray signal at frequencies of 1 trillion trillion hertz. (10^24)" This value coincides with the last mass group (mass group 16) in the 1024-QAM table at 100 ZeV. Beyond this mass group, there are no more elementary particles - and this explains the dip. This provides further evidence that the 1024-QAM Model is correct.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-solar-gamma-rays-discovered-at-even-higher-energies-20230227/
This also suggests that some of the vibrations found in frequencies of 10^12 thru 10^23 are likely from elementary particles as predicted by the 1024-QAM model. For example, if there are 4 peaks in the range of 100 ZeV thru 990 ZeV, then this may be evidence of the 4 particles - Wino, Zino, Higgsino, & Grand.
5) Theodore Lach's equation, at first seemed very promising, but I now believe it is not correct. We can estimate the mass values of unidentified particles, and using an invention called a "Mass Trap" - we may be able to isolate them. A Mass Trap would be a device that only allows a mass of a narrow range of values to pass thru - sort of like a low pass and high pass filter together creating a narrow range.
6) If it can be isolated, the Grand particle is possibly so large that it can be seen with the naked eye, under certain conditions. It is possibly as large as a single cell. Is it possibly as large as the entire calculated universe? = 0.272 mm (0.01")
6) In schematic theory, the 3 universes of Matter, Antimatter, and Dream, can be fitted together like a "Y" shape, where the Dream universe is in the middle and "feeding" particles into the universes of matter and antimatter. The question remains - how do parallel universes "fit" together with these schematics? Does the Dream universe also feed the parallel universes? This seems necessary for the universes to be related.
7) Is there any method to prove the existence of Massless particles in the Dream universe? It seems like a very challenging problem... Perhaps monitoring the influx of particles at the E point - might show evidence of the particles acquiring mass.
8) Seth said that by closely watching the neutral line (C and E points) we should be able to glimpse into the universe of antimatter. A very interesting prospect...
9) The Mass Groups of the Dream Universe cannot really be called that. Perhaps "Energy Groups" is a better term.
10) It seems odd that there are only 512 particles in the Dream Universe. A more elegant solution would seem to be, the same number of particles. There must be a valid reason for this? Do mass particles need to appear in pairs for some reason?
11) Our entire universal design seems to be structured around counting in "tens" and orders of magnitude. Why would every intelligent race necessarily count in "tens"? They might learn to count in Base 2 or Base 8...
12) The next easiest particles to identify should be Tetra, Nu, and Epsilon. These were the first 3 that I predicted. The mass range suggests they are easy to find. They might already be hidden in the data of previous experiments at CERN and FERMI.
13) In 1991, the Oh-My-God particle's energy was estimated as (3.2±0.9)×10^20 eV. This amount of ~100 FeV, lines up nicely with the 1024-QAM Model. It may have been an sStrange particle, the heavyweight counterpart of the Strange particle.
14) At least seven similar events (energy 5.7×10^19 eV or greater) have been recorded.
|
I propose that the specific mass values for supersymmetry can be found in cosmic-ray data. Look for patterns of four.
|
Note the "bump" at approx 318 FeV.
|
1024 Elementary particles
https://www.rlighthouse.com/store/p6/The_First_Periodic_Table_for_Elementary_Particles.html
This short technical ebook presents a new standard model for Elementary Particles. All elementary particle masses are related by simple math. This math is similar to the math used for wifi signals and it is called 1024-QAM. The 1024-QAM table graphically displays how all elementary particles are related, similar to the Standard Periodic Table in chemistry. If we line up all of the particle masses in order, we find there are a number of “gaps.” These are called the mass gaps, and they line up perfectly with 1024-QAM, which fits the sequence. Supersymmetry (SUSY) is also found to occur with 1024-QAM. Mass Groups 1 thru 8 have heavyweight counterparts which are found in Mass Groups 9 thru 16. 4 new particles are predicted to be discovered between 0.7 to 15 TeV. Also, 4 new particles are predicted to be discovered between 30 to 200 TeV. Numerous other new particles are predicted using 1024-QAM. The only possible explanation for elementary particles to match a QAM pattern, is due to a blinking or discrete universe. This ebook provides compelling evidence that our universe is literally blinking, off and on. This blinking frequency is about 1.1 THz.
This author challenges scientists in the particle physics field to provide a better model than 1024-QAM, that will fit the “mass gaps.” I suggest starting with a QAM model and see what format you think will best fit the existing experimental data that is available. In my opinion, the data to support 1024-QAM is already available at CERN, Berkeley, Fermi Lab, Brookhaven, Perimeter Institute, and Stanford. No expensive, new experiment will need to be run.
#BlinkingUniverse
|
1. Introduction
The math for the QAM table is simple and elegant. No previous particle model has been able to explain the mass gaps. The QAM model beautifully explains the mass gaps.
QAM stands for Quadrature Amplitude Modulation. Digital-QAM is a data transmission method that can be used to broadcast television pictures or WiFi signals, and many other applications. For digital applications involving computers, its use seems obvious. However, for applications involving physical reality – this may seem confusing, until it is understood that our universe is literally blinking off and on.
QAM in dynamic motion can be seen here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrature_amplitude_modulation
The math for the QAM table is simple and elegant. No previous particle model has been able to explain the mass gaps. The QAM model beautifully explains the mass gaps.
QAM stands for Quadrature Amplitude Modulation. Digital-QAM is a data transmission method that can be used to broadcast television pictures or WiFi signals, and many other applications. For digital applications involving computers, its use seems obvious. However, for applications involving physical reality – this may seem confusing, until it is understood that our universe is literally blinking off and on.
QAM in dynamic motion can be seen here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrature_amplitude_modulation
Figure 3. 1024-QAM. 4 Quadrants with 16 Mass Groups and 16 probabilities for a total of 1024 points. Note that each quadrant contains 256 points and has 16 Mass Groups and 16 probabilities. The 16 probabilities are the vertical column (red) of points from the blue baseline. There are 4 x 4 x 4 possible mass types for a total of 64. There are 4 possible charge types and 4 possible spin types.
Figure 4. This is how the center of the 1024-QAM table might look like. Note the sequence of red numbers – this is the basic pattern for QAM. It is apparent that the first 4 particle masses are Bosons. There may be some minor changes is the order of leptons and quarks, but the pattern is basically predictable. In our search for particles, it is clear we have skipped over some lightweight particle masses, or we may need to target our future searches for specific masses. Bosons are orange, Leptons are green, and quarks are purple.
My initial thoughts looking at this table are: I can't believe that we missed all of these lightweight particles! How can this be correct? However, I ask you to consider – how many chemicals were missed and skipped over when the Chemical Periodic Table was being assembled in the 1800's and early 1900's? Anyone that knows this history can confirm – many of the elements were rare in nature and had not been identified. The difference is - this time we are working with a mathematical pattern, not just experimental evidence.
The other possibility - is that these missing particles are dark matter.
My initial thoughts looking at this table are: I can't believe that we missed all of these lightweight particles! How can this be correct? However, I ask you to consider – how many chemicals were missed and skipped over when the Chemical Periodic Table was being assembled in the 1800's and early 1900's? Anyone that knows this history can confirm – many of the elements were rare in nature and had not been identified. The difference is - this time we are working with a mathematical pattern, not just experimental evidence.
The other possibility - is that these missing particles are dark matter.
|
Figure 5. This is the 10-bit format for 1024-QAM. Each position has 4 possible data values: 00, 01, 10, and 11. This equals a total of 1024 possible particles. Our universe is literally constructed with a mathematical pattern. |
s
Obsolete Diagram from 2021:
Obsolete Diagram from 2021:
Figure 6. Periodic Table for Elementary Particles showing all 16 mass groups. Each particle has 16 probabilities = 4 charges X 4 Spins. Total Particle count = 1024. This is the new standard model. Note how the particles appear in groups of four. This is typical of a QAM or wifi signal. They are arranged by mass groups in a natural pattern. Our universe is constructed using a simple mathematical pattern. It provides compelling evidence that our universe is literally blinking, off and on, at a high frequency. Note that the pattern of quarks and leptons can be “filled-in” from the previously available known data. Although it may need some minor corrections from what is shown in this table, the pattern is basically predictable.
Note that we are aware of 3 particle types: Lepton, Quark, and Boson. In a pattern of 4's (QAM) – there must be a 4th particle type. I call the 4th particle type, “Quaterns.” They are the heavyweight counterparts for the Boson, and have a similar purpose within the particle field. When we discover the photino soon, it will be a Quatern. This is not simply a new particle, it is a new type of particle.
4. Further Research
Theodore Lach (Reference 8). His equation:
ln (0.511/1777.1) = -3e
Note these values are known particle masses. I was not able to come up with a solution using his form. Pattern appears to be more closely related to a hyperbolic function.
5. Conclusions
Mass Gaps, charge, spin and amplitude are readily identified and arranged by a Digital-QAM table.
References
1. Richard Lighthouse, Mathematical Solution Unifying the Four Fundamental Forces in Nature, Smashwords.com; 2013. www.smashwords.com/books/view/374500
2. Richard Lighthouse, The First Periodic Table for Elementary Particles; Smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/461826
3. Richard Lighthouse, The Discovery of Parallel Universes, smashwords.com; 2013.
www.smashwords.com/books/view/376593
4. Richard Lighthouse, Identification of Elementary Particles in the Mass Groups, smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/445062
5. Richard Lighthouse, Anomalous Magnetic Moment: Source and Explanation, smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/447537
6. Richard Lighthouse, Elementary Particles: The 4th Spin Type, smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/449983
7. Seth (Jane Roberts) Early Sessions, Book 2, Session 60, 1964. “Matter is continually created, but no particular physical object is in itself continuous... No particular physical particle exists for any amount of time. It exists and disappears, and is instantaneously replaced by another.”
8. Theodore Lach, “Masses of the Sub-Nuclear Particles;” arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0008026; submitted 14 August 2000.
9. Eric R. Scerri, “Master of Missing Elements,” American Scientist, September 2014, pg 358. Interesting historical note: Henry Moseley’s discoveries in the early 1900s, corrected the chemical periodic table and showed that, at least 3, chemical elements were missing from the table (atomic numbers 43, 61, and 75).
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges Seth, Jane Roberts, and Rob Butts for their significant contributions.
About: The author holds a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University.
= = = = = = = =
= = = = = = ==
Seth on "particles"
findingseth.com
“Any investigation of the basic inner universe, which is the only real universe, must be done as much as possible from a point outside your own distortions … To get outside your own universe, you must travel inward … Your so-called scientific, so-called objective experiments can continue for an eternity, but they will only probe further and further with camouflage [physical] instruments into a camouflage universe … The subconscious, it is true, has elements of its own distortions, but these are easier to escape than the tons of distortive camouflage atmosphere that weigh your scientific experiments down.”
Session 45. The Early Sessions.
No particular physical particle exists for any amount of time.
No particular physical particle has any kind of durability.
TES2 Session 60 June 8, 1964
The framework is so woven that each particle is dependent upon every other. [...]
[...] It is the developer of all abilities and at the risk of being trite, it is the responsibility of even the most minute particle of consciousness to use its own abilities, and all of its abilities to the utmost.
TES1 Session 29 February 26, 1964
I have said that, first of all, molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, have a condensed consciousness.
[...] The molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, all contain their separate consciousness. [...]
This goes on ad infinitum, and yet even the lowest particle retains its own individuality, and is not stripped of any ability.
TES2 Session 50 May 4, 1964
If we may speak in an analogy, then these particles have two faces. If you consider them as soldiers guarding the barriers or the boundaries, then you would have to imagine a strange creature, our particle, as a soldier on a boundary facing toward and away from the country in question.
[...] The inner alignment and electromagnetic structure of such particles is the main issue that allows them to be, or to operate within, two different units or systems. And while these particles act as resistant boundary forces, they are also uniting forces, forming so to speak the connective tissue that both separates and unites.
These identifying particles, as we will call them, that both close about a system yet still unite it to other systems, these particles are also inherent properties of any unit or system.
TES3 Session 114 December 14, 1964
These coordinate points — absolute, main, or subordinate — represent accumulations or traces of pure energy, minute to an extreme if you are thinking in terms of size — smaller than any particle of which your scientists know for example, but composed of pure energy. [...]
[...] They are, if you prefer, incipient particles that have not yet emerged into matter.
SS Part One: Chapter 5: Session 524, April 20, 1970
There are indeed universes composed of such faster-than-light particles. [...] You simply would not perceive such particles as mass. When these particles are slowed down sufficiently, you do experience them as matter.
SS Part Two: Chapter 20: Session 581, April 14, 1971
While this may sound quite sacrilegious scientifically, it is possible to understand the electron’s nature and greater reality by using certain focuses of consciousness: by probing the electron, for example, with a “laser” [beam] of consciousness finely focused and attuned — and more will be said about this later in the book.
UR1 Section 3: Session 703 June 12, 1974
So can the human self appear in several places at once, each such appearance subtly altering the “human” particle, so that each appearance is a version of an “original” self that as itself never appears in those terms.6 When you look at an electron — figuratively speaking — you are observing a trace or a track of something else entirely, and that appearance is termed an electron. [...] In a way, then, you are as ghostly as an electron.
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
“Subatomic particles,” however, appear in your present, rippling into your system’s dimensions, creating their own “tracks,” which scientists then try to observe. In some cases, unknowingly, your scientists are close to observing the birth of time effects within your system."
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
This section also includes discussions on the True Dream-Art Scientist, the True Mental Physicist, and the Complete Physician, as well as material on subatomic particles and the spin of electrons in relationship to perceived reality.
UR2 Introductory Notes by Robert F. Butts, 1974
The behavior of electrons, for example, will elude your technological knowledge — for in deepest terms what you will “perceive” will be a facade, an appearance or illusion. So far, within the rules of the game, you have been able to make your “facts” about electrons work. To follow their multidimensional activity however is another matter — (humorously:) a pun — and you need, if you will forgive me, a speedier means.
UR1 Section 3: Session 702 June 10, 1974
Electrons, for example, are slow dullards in comparison with EE units. It goes without saying that the units of consciousness are “mental,” or if you prefer, disembodied, though from their inner organization all physical forms emerge. [...] [...] Now the same applies to these units of consciousness — and to atoms, molecules, electrons, and other such phenomena.
UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974
If physical form is made up of such multitudinous, invisible particles, how much more highly organized must be the inner components of consciousness, without whose perceptions matter itself would be meaningless. The alliances of consciousness, then, are far more vast than those of particles in any form.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Every visible or invisible particle has consciousness according to its own scale of reality. Each particle, visible or invisible, is awareized energy. This is most difficult to explain, but like, say, the units of some multidimensional computer, each visible or invisible particle carries within it the knowledge of all other particles, including their positions, and their probable positions.
[...] There is then an almost instantaneous flow of information throughout such particles. [...]
That same information is available on a cellular basis (pause), and to the smaller particles that make up the bodies of the experimenters, and the structure of the instruments.
TPS5 Deleted Session April 30, 1979
Each unit of consciousness inherently possesses within itself all of the information available to the whole, and its specific nature when it operates as a particle rests upon that great “body” of inner knowledge. Any one such particle can be where it “is,” be what it is, and be when it is only because the positions, relative positions, and situations of all other such particles are known.
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. [...] There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
[...] All of these units of consciousness, again, operate as entities (or particles, or as waves or forces).
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
It is fashionable to say that some scientific laws can be proven at microscopic levels, where, for example, small particles can be accelerated far beyond [their usual states]. But you quite studiously ignore that feeling exists on microscopic levels, that there can be psychological particles, much less come to the conclusion that all particles are psychological particles, with their own impetuses for development and value fulfillment. [...]
(9:23.) If the simplest particle is so endowed with impetus, with hidden ideals that seek fulfillment, then what about the human being?
NoME Part Three: Chapter 9: Session 866, July 18, 1979
All That Is composes the fabric of the universe—which is everywhere unified, since nothing exists outside of it, and every wave or particle, or field or whatever within it, consists of a divine psychological fabric that is populated by individuation, sensation, meaning, intent, in which the most innocuous shadow of an electron rises up joyfully and shouts “I am I, and not you.”
TPS5 Deleted Session September 20, 1978
Consciousness is within the tiniest particle, whatever its life conditions seem to be, or however it might seem to lack those conditions you call living.
I know that each smallest “particle” of consciousness can never be broken down, and that each contains an infinite capacity for creativity and development — and that each is innately blessed.
NotP Chapter 11: Session 796, March 7, 1977
Electrons in your terms are precognitive, and so is your cellular consciousness. Your body’s relative permanence in time is dependent upon the electron’s magnificent behavior as it deals with probabilities.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 888, December 10, 1979
"...some particles live for far less than a trillionth of a second."
DEaVF1 Chapter 2: Session 884, October 3, 1979
The varieties of consciousness—the inner “psychological particles,” the psychic equivalent, say, of the atom or molecule, or proton, neutron or quark—these nonphysical, charmed, strange forms of consciousness that make experience go up or down (all with amusement), and around and around, are never of course dealt with.
The atom, the molecule, the proton and neutron, the electrons, the quarks and other families of particles represent aspects of consciousness itself, which man then projects into the world of physics.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Beyond certain levels it is almost meaningless to speak in terms of particles, but I will for now use the term “invisible particles” because you are familiar with it. Invisible particles, then, form the foundation of your world. The invisible particles that I am referring to, however, have the ability to transform themselves into mass, or to divest themselves of it. And the invisible particles of which I speak not only possess consciousness—but each one is, if you will, a seed that contains within itself a potential for an infinite number of gestalts. Each such invisible particle contains within itself the potential (pause) to embark upon an infinite number of probable variations of consciousness. To that degree such psychological particles are at that stage unspecialized, while they contain within themselves the innate ability to specialize in whatever direction becomes suitable.
DEaVF2 Chapter 8: Session 915, May 12, 1980
All particles will try to combine with each other in as many different probable ways as possible.
The same applies to all “psychological” particles, to units of consciousness, and to their affiliations within personality.
TPS5 Session 898 (Deleted Portion) January 30, 1980
The atoms and molecules are forever moving, and in a way the electrons are the directors of that motion.
WTH Part One: Chapter 1: January 13, 1984
Each unit of consciousness (or CU) intensifies, magnifies its own intent to be—and, you might say, works up from within itself an explosive spark of primal desire that “explodes” into a process that causes physical materialization. It turns into what I have called [an] EE unit,1 in which case it is embarked upon its own kind of physical experience.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. Their die is cast, so to speak: They have already begun the special kind of screening process necessary that will bring about physical form. They begin to deal with the kinds of information that will help form your world. There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
Units of consciousness (CU’s), transforming themselves into EE units, formed the environment and all of its inhabitants in the same process, in what you might call a circular manner rather than a serial one. And in those terms, of course, there are only various physical manifestations of consciousness, not a planet and its inhabitants, but an entire gestalt of awareized consciousness.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
CAUTION: The government criminals have likely placed tracking tags on the files and images of this website.
Note that we are aware of 3 particle types: Lepton, Quark, and Boson. In a pattern of 4's (QAM) – there must be a 4th particle type. I call the 4th particle type, “Quaterns.” They are the heavyweight counterparts for the Boson, and have a similar purpose within the particle field. When we discover the photino soon, it will be a Quatern. This is not simply a new particle, it is a new type of particle.
4. Further Research
Theodore Lach (Reference 8). His equation:
ln (0.511/1777.1) = -3e
Note these values are known particle masses. I was not able to come up with a solution using his form. Pattern appears to be more closely related to a hyperbolic function.
5. Conclusions
Mass Gaps, charge, spin and amplitude are readily identified and arranged by a Digital-QAM table.
References
1. Richard Lighthouse, Mathematical Solution Unifying the Four Fundamental Forces in Nature, Smashwords.com; 2013. www.smashwords.com/books/view/374500
2. Richard Lighthouse, The First Periodic Table for Elementary Particles; Smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/461826
3. Richard Lighthouse, The Discovery of Parallel Universes, smashwords.com; 2013.
www.smashwords.com/books/view/376593
4. Richard Lighthouse, Identification of Elementary Particles in the Mass Groups, smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/445062
5. Richard Lighthouse, Anomalous Magnetic Moment: Source and Explanation, smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/447537
6. Richard Lighthouse, Elementary Particles: The 4th Spin Type, smashwords.com; 2014. www.smashwords.com/books/view/449983
7. Seth (Jane Roberts) Early Sessions, Book 2, Session 60, 1964. “Matter is continually created, but no particular physical object is in itself continuous... No particular physical particle exists for any amount of time. It exists and disappears, and is instantaneously replaced by another.”
8. Theodore Lach, “Masses of the Sub-Nuclear Particles;” arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0008026; submitted 14 August 2000.
9. Eric R. Scerri, “Master of Missing Elements,” American Scientist, September 2014, pg 358. Interesting historical note: Henry Moseley’s discoveries in the early 1900s, corrected the chemical periodic table and showed that, at least 3, chemical elements were missing from the table (atomic numbers 43, 61, and 75).
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges Seth, Jane Roberts, and Rob Butts for their significant contributions.
About: The author holds a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University.
= = = = = = = =
= = = = = = ==
Seth on "particles"
findingseth.com
“Any investigation of the basic inner universe, which is the only real universe, must be done as much as possible from a point outside your own distortions … To get outside your own universe, you must travel inward … Your so-called scientific, so-called objective experiments can continue for an eternity, but they will only probe further and further with camouflage [physical] instruments into a camouflage universe … The subconscious, it is true, has elements of its own distortions, but these are easier to escape than the tons of distortive camouflage atmosphere that weigh your scientific experiments down.”
Session 45. The Early Sessions.
No particular physical particle exists for any amount of time.
No particular physical particle has any kind of durability.
TES2 Session 60 June 8, 1964
The framework is so woven that each particle is dependent upon every other. [...]
[...] It is the developer of all abilities and at the risk of being trite, it is the responsibility of even the most minute particle of consciousness to use its own abilities, and all of its abilities to the utmost.
TES1 Session 29 February 26, 1964
I have said that, first of all, molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, have a condensed consciousness.
[...] The molecules and atoms and even smaller particles, all contain their separate consciousness. [...]
This goes on ad infinitum, and yet even the lowest particle retains its own individuality, and is not stripped of any ability.
TES2 Session 50 May 4, 1964
If we may speak in an analogy, then these particles have two faces. If you consider them as soldiers guarding the barriers or the boundaries, then you would have to imagine a strange creature, our particle, as a soldier on a boundary facing toward and away from the country in question.
[...] The inner alignment and electromagnetic structure of such particles is the main issue that allows them to be, or to operate within, two different units or systems. And while these particles act as resistant boundary forces, they are also uniting forces, forming so to speak the connective tissue that both separates and unites.
These identifying particles, as we will call them, that both close about a system yet still unite it to other systems, these particles are also inherent properties of any unit or system.
TES3 Session 114 December 14, 1964
These coordinate points — absolute, main, or subordinate — represent accumulations or traces of pure energy, minute to an extreme if you are thinking in terms of size — smaller than any particle of which your scientists know for example, but composed of pure energy. [...]
[...] They are, if you prefer, incipient particles that have not yet emerged into matter.
SS Part One: Chapter 5: Session 524, April 20, 1970
There are indeed universes composed of such faster-than-light particles. [...] You simply would not perceive such particles as mass. When these particles are slowed down sufficiently, you do experience them as matter.
SS Part Two: Chapter 20: Session 581, April 14, 1971
While this may sound quite sacrilegious scientifically, it is possible to understand the electron’s nature and greater reality by using certain focuses of consciousness: by probing the electron, for example, with a “laser” [beam] of consciousness finely focused and attuned — and more will be said about this later in the book.
UR1 Section 3: Session 703 June 12, 1974
So can the human self appear in several places at once, each such appearance subtly altering the “human” particle, so that each appearance is a version of an “original” self that as itself never appears in those terms.6 When you look at an electron — figuratively speaking — you are observing a trace or a track of something else entirely, and that appearance is termed an electron. [...] In a way, then, you are as ghostly as an electron.
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
“Subatomic particles,” however, appear in your present, rippling into your system’s dimensions, creating their own “tracks,” which scientists then try to observe. In some cases, unknowingly, your scientists are close to observing the birth of time effects within your system."
UR2 Section 5: Session 722 November 27, 1974
This section also includes discussions on the True Dream-Art Scientist, the True Mental Physicist, and the Complete Physician, as well as material on subatomic particles and the spin of electrons in relationship to perceived reality.
UR2 Introductory Notes by Robert F. Butts, 1974
The behavior of electrons, for example, will elude your technological knowledge — for in deepest terms what you will “perceive” will be a facade, an appearance or illusion. So far, within the rules of the game, you have been able to make your “facts” about electrons work. To follow their multidimensional activity however is another matter — (humorously:) a pun — and you need, if you will forgive me, a speedier means.
UR1 Section 3: Session 702 June 10, 1974
Electrons, for example, are slow dullards in comparison with EE units. It goes without saying that the units of consciousness are “mental,” or if you prefer, disembodied, though from their inner organization all physical forms emerge. [...] [...] Now the same applies to these units of consciousness — and to atoms, molecules, electrons, and other such phenomena.
UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974
If physical form is made up of such multitudinous, invisible particles, how much more highly organized must be the inner components of consciousness, without whose perceptions matter itself would be meaningless. The alliances of consciousness, then, are far more vast than those of particles in any form.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Every visible or invisible particle has consciousness according to its own scale of reality. Each particle, visible or invisible, is awareized energy. This is most difficult to explain, but like, say, the units of some multidimensional computer, each visible or invisible particle carries within it the knowledge of all other particles, including their positions, and their probable positions.
[...] There is then an almost instantaneous flow of information throughout such particles. [...]
That same information is available on a cellular basis (pause), and to the smaller particles that make up the bodies of the experimenters, and the structure of the instruments.
TPS5 Deleted Session April 30, 1979
Each unit of consciousness inherently possesses within itself all of the information available to the whole, and its specific nature when it operates as a particle rests upon that great “body” of inner knowledge. Any one such particle can be where it “is,” be what it is, and be when it is only because the positions, relative positions, and situations of all other such particles are known.
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. [...] There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
[...] All of these units of consciousness, again, operate as entities (or particles, or as waves or forces).
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
It is fashionable to say that some scientific laws can be proven at microscopic levels, where, for example, small particles can be accelerated far beyond [their usual states]. But you quite studiously ignore that feeling exists on microscopic levels, that there can be psychological particles, much less come to the conclusion that all particles are psychological particles, with their own impetuses for development and value fulfillment. [...]
(9:23.) If the simplest particle is so endowed with impetus, with hidden ideals that seek fulfillment, then what about the human being?
NoME Part Three: Chapter 9: Session 866, July 18, 1979
All That Is composes the fabric of the universe—which is everywhere unified, since nothing exists outside of it, and every wave or particle, or field or whatever within it, consists of a divine psychological fabric that is populated by individuation, sensation, meaning, intent, in which the most innocuous shadow of an electron rises up joyfully and shouts “I am I, and not you.”
TPS5 Deleted Session September 20, 1978
Consciousness is within the tiniest particle, whatever its life conditions seem to be, or however it might seem to lack those conditions you call living.
I know that each smallest “particle” of consciousness can never be broken down, and that each contains an infinite capacity for creativity and development — and that each is innately blessed.
NotP Chapter 11: Session 796, March 7, 1977
Electrons in your terms are precognitive, and so is your cellular consciousness. Your body’s relative permanence in time is dependent upon the electron’s magnificent behavior as it deals with probabilities.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 888, December 10, 1979
"...some particles live for far less than a trillionth of a second."
DEaVF1 Chapter 2: Session 884, October 3, 1979
The varieties of consciousness—the inner “psychological particles,” the psychic equivalent, say, of the atom or molecule, or proton, neutron or quark—these nonphysical, charmed, strange forms of consciousness that make experience go up or down (all with amusement), and around and around, are never of course dealt with.
The atom, the molecule, the proton and neutron, the electrons, the quarks and other families of particles represent aspects of consciousness itself, which man then projects into the world of physics.
TPS4 Deleted Session July 3, 1978
Beyond certain levels it is almost meaningless to speak in terms of particles, but I will for now use the term “invisible particles” because you are familiar with it. Invisible particles, then, form the foundation of your world. The invisible particles that I am referring to, however, have the ability to transform themselves into mass, or to divest themselves of it. And the invisible particles of which I speak not only possess consciousness—but each one is, if you will, a seed that contains within itself a potential for an infinite number of gestalts. Each such invisible particle contains within itself the potential (pause) to embark upon an infinite number of probable variations of consciousness. To that degree such psychological particles are at that stage unspecialized, while they contain within themselves the innate ability to specialize in whatever direction becomes suitable.
DEaVF2 Chapter 8: Session 915, May 12, 1980
All particles will try to combine with each other in as many different probable ways as possible.
The same applies to all “psychological” particles, to units of consciousness, and to their affiliations within personality.
TPS5 Session 898 (Deleted Portion) January 30, 1980
The atoms and molecules are forever moving, and in a way the electrons are the directors of that motion.
WTH Part One: Chapter 1: January 13, 1984
Each unit of consciousness (or CU) intensifies, magnifies its own intent to be—and, you might say, works up from within itself an explosive spark of primal desire that “explodes” into a process that causes physical materialization. It turns into what I have called [an] EE unit,1 in which case it is embarked upon its own kind of physical experience.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. Their die is cast, so to speak: They have already begun the special kind of screening process necessary that will bring about physical form. They begin to deal with the kinds of information that will help form your world. There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels (underlined) from their own greater fields of “information,” to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.
Units of consciousness (CU’s), transforming themselves into EE units, formed the environment and all of its inhabitants in the same process, in what you might call a circular manner rather than a serial one. And in those terms, of course, there are only various physical manifestations of consciousness, not a planet and its inhabitants, but an entire gestalt of awareized consciousness.
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979
CAUTION: The government criminals have likely placed tracking tags on the files and images of this website.
Targeted Individuals
individuos apuntados
Individuo dirigido
Personne ciblée
Individu ciblé
فرد مستهدف
目标个人
目標個人
लक्षित व्यक्ति
Individu yang Disasarkan
Целевая личность
লক্ষ্যযুক্ত ব্যক্তি
Indivíduo segmentado
対象者
Zielgruppe
Diangkah Individu
대상 개인
Hedeflenen Birey
Cá nhân được nhắm mục tiêu
లక్ష్యంగా ఉన్న వ్యక్తి
लक्ष्यित वैयक्तिक
இலக்கு தனிநபர்
Individuo mirato
نشانہ انفرادی۔
લક્ષ્યાંકિત વ્યક્તિગત
Ukierunkowana osoba
Цільова особа
فردی هدفمند
ടാർഗെറ്റുചെയ്ത വ്യക്തിഗത
ಉದ್ದೇಶಿತ ವೈಯಕ್ತಿಕ
ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨਾ ਵਿਅਕਤੀਗਤ
ඉලක්කගත තනි පුද්ගලයෙකි
Individual vizat
Məqsədli Fərdi