.
2022 - Christiana has filed 2 new lawsuits against Targeted Justice - one in Arizona and one in Texas.
Here are 3 certified courtroom documents about Christiana that you can read. These are public records.
The Clerk's certification stamp appears on the last page.
- CHRISTIANA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, No. G057447
- CHRISTIANA v. CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, No. G056944.
- The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Thomas CHRISTIANA, Defendant and Appellant., No. E048681.
Here are 3 certified courtroom documents about Christiana that you can read. These are public records.
The Clerk's certification stamp appears on the last page.
- CHRISTIANA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, No. G057447
- CHRISTIANA v. CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, No. G056944.
- The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Thomas CHRISTIANA, Defendant and Appellant., No. E048681.
|
|
| ||||||
Targeted Justice won the lawsuit in Arizona in 2020.
1) Attorney for Targeted Justice responds in support of Motion for Summary Judgement.
2) Judge Wismer grants Motion for Summary Judgement. Targeted Justice wins.
|
| ||||
First Amendment - Free Speech
Three important court cases at the U.S. Supreme Court
Can we criticize government officials? Absolutely!
1. Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665 (1944)
“One of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures — and that means not only informed and responsible criticism, but the freedom to speak foolishly and without moderation.”
2. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
Government cannot punish speech unless it is intended to incite “imminent lawless action,” and is "likely to produce such action."
3. Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973)
Mere advocacy of a future, potential crime, is not a crime. It is Free Speech.
Here is what our Attorney said about Christiana's claims:
In a Motion for Summary Judgement (MSJ).
This is a public record.
From the record:
"...summary judgement should be entered in favor of the Defendants (Targeted Justice) dismissing with prejudice the causes of action asserted in Plaintiff's (Christiana) FAC (First Amended Complaint) because the undisputed facts in this case establish Plaintiff's causes of action fail as a matter of law."
"At no time has Targeted Justice been contacted by the FBI or any other law enforcement agency..."
"As demonstrated in this Motion, Plaintiff (Christiana) initiated this lawsuit without reasonable cause, and his causes of action were not well grounded in fact and existing law. Plaintiff's entire lawsuit is premised on his allegations..."
"Plaintiff (Christiana) asserts a Wrongful Termination claim despite knowing he was never employed by Targeted Justice. Plaintiff alleges he has incurred emotional distress, despite the fact it is undisputed he was not the target of alleged crimes and was not present when the alleged crimes occurred. Plaintiff asserts claims for Negligence and Defamation without providing cursory details supporting these claims, such as specifying the alleged negligent conduct and the defamatory statements made against him."
"Defendants (Targeted Justice) should be Awarded their Attorney's Fees."
Public information about Christiana:
https://www.sierrawave.net/christiana-entered-plea-to-arson-faces-sentencing/
Targeted Individuals
individuos apuntados
Individuo dirigido
Personne ciblée
Individu ciblé
فرد مستهدف
目标个人
目標個人
लक्षित व्यक्ति
Individu yang Disasarkan
Целевая личность
লক্ষ্যযুক্ত ব্যক্তি
Indivíduo segmentado
対象者
Zielgruppe
Diangkah Individu
대상 개인
Hedeflenen Birey
Cá nhân được nhắm mục tiêu
లక్ష్యంగా ఉన్న వ్యక్తి
लक्ष्यित वैयक्तिक
இலக்கு தனிநபர்
Individuo mirato
نشانہ انفرادی۔
લક્ષ્યાંકિત વ્યક્તિગત
Ukierunkowana osoba
Цільова особа
فردی هدفمند
ടാർഗെറ്റുചെയ്ത വ്യക്തിഗത
ಉದ್ದೇಶಿತ ವೈಯಕ್ತಿಕ
ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨਾ ਵਿਅਕਤੀਗਤ
ඉලක්කගත තනි පුද්ගලයෙකි
Individual vizat
Məqsədli Fərdi